 |
Alább egy rövid összefoglaló az idegennyelvű cikkből fordító használata ajánlott.
"Nem tudom, ki mennyi tudományos szakirodalmat olvas... de ez ÜBERGÁZ, amiről itt írnak.
Hogyaszongya':
(...)A világ egyik leghíresebb egyetemén (Princeton) egy stratégiai kockázatelemző írja, mit nyilatkozott nemrég a világ két ULTRA tekintélyes orvosi folyóiratának (The Lancet és NEJM) a főszerkesztője.
Főszerkesztőként óriási rálátásuk és ráhatásuk volt, van arra, mi számít orvostudományi szenzációnak az egész világon.
Na most ezek az emberek ELKÉPESZTŐEN erős kritikát fogalmaztak meg azzal kapcsolatban, hogyan működik manapság a kutatási eredmények publikálásának rendszere. Szerintük túl sok a gyógyszergyártók, vakcinagyártók, műszergyártók által szponzorált kutatás, melyek kicsi mintákon kicsi és kétes hatásokat mutatnak ki, ehhez képest mégis túlságosan meghatározóvá válnak az eü gyakorlatban.
Egyértelműen korrupcióról, tudományhamisításról, csalásról, egyéb etikátlanságokról és törvénytelenségekről beszélnek.
És nem lila és kótyagos bigpharma-utáló konteósok... hanem a lehető leghitelesebb szakemberek a Földön, akik okkal mondják, amit.
Szerintük kábé' a publikált kutatások fele (!) egy rakás sz@r, különösen a gyógyszerhatást elemzőek.
Elgondolkodtató a világ minden egészségügyi kormányzata számára - mivel az EBM, a tudományos bizonyítékokon alapuló orvoslás alapjai rendülnek meg, amikor azt mutatják a tények, hogy a "bizonyítékok" a visszaélések miatt jórészt hamisak. Hogyan lehet ezekre szakmai protokollokat alapozni?!
Újragondolandó az egész rendszer.(...)"
Shocking Report from Medical Insiders
F. William Engdahl (NEO) : A shocking
admission by the editor of the world’s most respected medical
journal, The Lancet, has been virtually ignored by the mainstream
media. Dr. Richard Horton, Editor-in-chief of the Lancet recently
published a statement declaring that a shocking amount of published
research is unreliable at best, if not completely false, as in,
fraudulent.
Horton
declared, “Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may
simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny
effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of
interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends
of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.”
To state the point in other words, Horton states
bluntly that major pharmaceutical companies falsify or manipulate
tests on the health, safety and effectiveness of their various drugs
by taking samples too small to be statistically meaningful or hiring
test labs or scientists where the lab or scientist has blatant
conflicts of interest such as pleasing the drug company to get
further grants. At least half of all such tests are worthless or
worse he claims. As the drugs have a major effect on the health of
millions of consumers, the manipulation amounts to criminal
dereliction and malfeasance.
The drug industry-sponsored studies Horton refers to
develop commercial drugs or vaccines to supposedly help people, used
to train medical staff, to educate medical students and more.
Horton wrote his shocking comments after attending a
symposium on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical
research at the Wellcome Trust in London. He noted the
confidentiality or “Chatham House” rules where attendees are
forbidden to name names: “’A lot of what is published is
incorrect.’ I’m not allowed to say who made this remark because
we were asked to observe Chatham House rules. We were also asked not
to take photographs of slides.”
Other voices
Dr. Marcia Angell is a physician and was longtime
Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal (NEMJ), considered
to be another one of the most prestigious peer-reviewed medical
journals in the world. Angell stated,
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much
of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the
judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I
take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and
reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England
Journal of Medicine.”
Harvey Marcovitch, who has studied and written about
the corruption of medical tests and publication in medical journals,
writes, “studies showing positive outcomes for a drug or device
under consideration are more likely to be published than ‘negative’
studies; editors are partly to blame for this but so are commercial
sponsors, whose methodologically well-conducted studies with
unfavorable results tended not to see the light of day…”
At the University of British Columbia’s Neural
Dynamics Research Group in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual
Sciences, Dr Lucija Tomljenovic obtained documents that showed that,
“vaccine manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, and health
authorities have known about multiple dangers associated with
vaccines but chose to withhold them from the public. This is
scientific fraud, and their complicity suggests that this practice
continues to this day.”
Lancet’s Dr. Horton concludes, “Those who have
the power to act seem to think somebody else should act first. And
every positive action (eg, funding well-powered replications) has a
counter-argument (science will become less creative). The good news
is that science is beginning to take some of its worst failings very
seriously. The bad news is that nobody is ready to take the first
step to clean up the system.
Corruption of the medical industry worldwide is a
huge issue, perhaps more dangerous than the threat of all wars
combined. Do we have such hypnosis and blind faith in our doctors
simply because of their white coats that we believe they are
infallible? And, in turn, do they have such blind faith in the
medical journals recommending a given new wonder medicine or vaccine
that they rush to give the drugs or vaccines without considering
these deeper issues?
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant
and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton
University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics,
exclusively for the online magazine “New
Eastern Outlook”.
Nincsenek megjegyzések:
Megjegyzés küldése